A lot of online resources provide quick and easy access to all the court records in the country. Online Decision Court records help to provide information about each and every Federal Court Decision as well as court decisions regarding local cases. State court decisions can also be verified by going through the relevant website. The Decision Court records can also be used as guidelines for legal rights and privileges. Supreme Court Decisions are not made arbitrarily. They are based on legal briefs and abstracts that are filed in the court. Parallels are drawn between the court cases in hand and a previous similar Supreme Court Decision before the court decides on a verdict. You can be privy to every small detail of the court cases if so inclined. The jurisdiction or the trial court makes the original court decisions.
According to the American law, a dissatisfied party can appeal for a review of the decision at the appellate court. You can also get information about the Appeals Court Decision in conjunction with the original Decision Court record. However the final verdict rests with the highest court of the State, which is the Supreme Court. Important Supreme Court Decisions can be viewed from the State or Federal databases. They can also be found online as a continuation of trial court and appellate court decisions.
Case numbers organizes most of the court case records. A search by case number will also lead you to the pleadings and legal papers filed in the case. You can then download or order the required documents by seeking permission of the court. However, all the abstracts and briefs concerned with the case are not available for personal use. The State Court may segregate certain documents. You need to know the case number in order to access the Supreme Court decisions. You can also find a number of resources online to find out the case numbers related to Supreme Court decisions.
The very source for information, the Internet has not been spared from the law either. There are over 600 court decisions, which have helped to shape the web of today. These decisions deal with a variety of problems including copyright and trademark infringement, gambling, privacy of an individual as well as spam. Recent Decision Court records show that statutes like the Communications Decency Act, Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act are often invoked during court hearings. Since the decisions dealing with the web are of paramount interest to Internet companies and individuals alike, you will come across a number of private websites claiming to analyze and interpret every cyber law for you. Decisions on Internet frauds can be accessed quite easily as well. Most of the sites list them alphabetically and the full text of each decision can be viewed by clicking on the corresponding hyperlink.
Recent and Landmark Court Decisions
Although most online search for court records are done for conducting background search or security reasons, researchers can also find interesting bits of information regarding Recent Court Decisions. The United States Supreme Court also makes decisions which become the law later. The Supreme Court Gun Decision is one such Landmark Court decision. In a 5-4 decision the court ruled that owning a gun is the right of an individual and should not be connected with military service in any way. However, the ban on a felon's right to keep a gun remains unhindered.
The Recent Court Decision of Stenberg v. Carhart in the year 2000 is particularly interesting as it partially invalidated the Nebraska law that proclaimed the ?partial birth' abortion as unlawful unless necessary to save the life of the woman. The Supreme Court arrived at this decision because the law was silent about protecting a woman's health. The State Supreme courts often develop new law by its decisions but only a few of them prove to be really path breaking. It is now possible to check these revolutionary decisions online.
Another recent court decision was the taken by the New Haven District court where the court granted a summary judgment to the defendants comprising of multiracial fire fighters who sued the city against racial discrimination. The second circuit court affirmed the decision taken by the district court.
Several landmark decisions of the courts of the United States of America have succeeded in creating history during that particular epoch. The Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) warrants special mention as it categorically denied the black Americans citizenship stating that all blacks including the freed ones were not citizens of the country. Hence they could not sue the Federal Government for injustice. Later on, however, this decision was revoked by the thirteenth and fourteenth amendments, after the civil war.
The amusing case of Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) was contested against the policy of setting different minimum ages permitted for buying beer (male 21,female 18). Sexual discrimination was cited by the accusor and the court decision upheld that the rule was unconstitutional since it directly contradicted the equal protection clause. There have also been several landmark decisions made in support of people with different sexual orientations. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) saw the due process clause of fourthneeth amendment prohibiting the Texan law which barrs homosexuals from having consensual sex.
The Controlled Substances Act commonly known as CSA has been made into law as Title II which is a part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act. The CSA was quoted when the State court ruled that doctors cannot assist terminally ill patients to commit suicide. [Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006)]
Apart from the civil laws, the US criminal laws have also undergone a lot of changes thanks to the landmark decisions taken by the courts. The case of Georgia v. Randolph contested in the year 2006 denies the State Enforcement force the right to search a person's house without warrant. The decision clearly states that the police cannot make a warrantless search of a house until and unless all the occupants give their consent. The recent court decision of 2008 [Kennedy v. Louisiana], stated that a rapist cannot be awarded a death penalty especially when the victim is alive and the accused did not have any intention of causing death.
The press including the electronic media and Internet companies have been at the receiving end of court decisions very frequently. However, Reno v. ACLU proved to be a small victory for them. The court decision stated that the Communications decency Act regulating the content on the Internet is unconstitutional in nature. Terroism has forced the government to rewrite certain laws. Most of these are relatively recent and have been enacted as law after the court decisions. An appropriate instance of this is Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. of 2008 which had the court deciding that foreign terrorist suspects have certain constitutional rights and cannot be detained on basis of suspicision alone.